|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IP Storage Framework document
- To: "Bradley, Mark" <mark_bradley@btc.adaptec.com>
- Subject: Re: IP Storage Framework document
- From: Vern Paxson <vern@ee.lbl.gov>
- Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2000 01:37:15 PST
- Cc: "'David R. Cheriton'" <cheriton@cisco.com>, Dave_Lee@3com.com, Andreas Bechtolsheim <avb@cisco.com>, Carl_Madison@3com.com, Arun_Verma@3com.com, kquick@iphase.com, bassoon@ece.cmu.edu, "VonStamwitz, Paul" <paulv@corp.adaptec.com>, "Wilson, Andrew" <dwilson@corp.adaptec.com>, raz@emc.com, rcampbel@cisco.com, Jgw@cisco.com, ddecapit@cisco.com, sob@harvard.edu, csapuntz@cisco.com
- Delivery-Date: Sat Feb 5 04:37:30 2000
- In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 04 Feb 2000 05:46:51 MST.
> 1)TCP in h/w is probably possible, but as others have found, it
> is very difficult to do.
Once a protocol such as this runs over IP, it will inevitably run over richer
and richer IP substrates; and, as it does, it will require congestion control,
intelligent retransmission policies, high performance windowing, etc. So
I think the path inevitably leads to TCP.
Vern
Home
Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:21 2001
6315 messages in chronological order
|