|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: BOF RequestHi, I'm working with Andy Bechtolsheim on the IP SAN initiative at Cisco. I believe we (the industry) are behind at this point because we (Cisco) have been hearing from our customers (and I'm sure you've been hearing from yours) that they want these technologies now. As such, much of the discussion on the charter and goals should happen before the BOF (on the ips mailing list). Let's make the IETF meeting be for serious high-bandwidth engineering discussion of the various approaches so we can attempt to reach consensus on a technical direction. Proposed agenda for BOF: > 5 min Review of BOF agenda and objectives (D. Lee/M. Bradley) > 10 min IP Storage Goals (D. Nagle/A. Wilson) > 15 min Discussion > 30 min Approaches & Implementations (10 min presentations) > o SCSI/TCP (TBA) > o Adaptec (A. Wilson) > o ISI's NetSCSI (?) > 40 min discussion > 5 min Proposed charters (D. Lee/M. Bradley/C. Sapuntzakis) > 15 min Discussion Our formal interaction with T10 and T11 should be minimized. The IETF strongly discourages the republishing of IETF standards by other organizations. In addition, IETF can work much more quickly than ANSI standards organizations. The only interaction I see with T13 is if we define an IDE transport protocol. ATAPI command sets are now handled through T10. FCP is an impressive protocol, especially in the bulk of documentation required to understand it. It is very much tied to Fibre Channel Physical Layer. Understanding FCP, its limitations, how it and its associated discovery mechanisms need to be fixed up to work in an IP environment is a large undertaking. FCP will seriously slow down the generation of any standard and impede the clarity of the final standard. A proposed charter: ------------------- Description of Working Group: The goal of this working group is to define extensions to current IETF transports for storage networking. There are a several areas to consider: - Reducing protocol processing overhead at servers and clients - SCSI transport on top of TCP - QoS parameters for storage networks - Running storage transports at multi-gigabit speeds The objectives of this working group are: * A proposed standard for a SCSI transport on top of TCP * A proposed standard for extensions to TCP that reduce protocol processing overhead. * Produce an informational RFC describing the QoS requirements of storage networks. Propose QoS extensions to diffserv if necessary. * Produce an informational RFC discussing the issues behind running storage transports at multi-gigabit speeds. -------------------------------------- -Costa > > ----- Begin Included Message ----- > > >From Dave_Lee@3com.com Wed Feb 9 03:17:02 2000 > From: Dave_Lee@3com.com > X-Lotus-FromDomain: 3COM > To: agenda@ietf.org > cc: sob@harvard.edu, mankin@isi.edu, Vern@Aciri.Org, markb@btc.adaptec.com, > Carl_Madison@3com.com, avb@cisco.com > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 03:15:23 -0800 > Subject: BOF Request > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Disposition: inline > X-SMTP-HELO: seattle.3com.com > X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: Dave_Lee@3com.com > X-SMAP-Received-From: outside > X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: seattle.3com.com [129.213.128.97] > > > > BOF Description > > The objective of this BOF is: > > 1. To consider the creation of a new IETF working group to enable storage > networking via IP-based storage interfaces of SCSI, ATAPI, FCP and other > interfaces. Only system-to-storage interfaces will be considered. > > 2. To develop and agree upon a charter for the new working group. > > 3. To consider the proposed operational characteristics of reliable and > unreliable communications, shared and non-shared, managed and unmanaged, and > integrity, privacy, and/or non-secure. Further, the protocol must > efficiently operate over LAN, campus, and WAN environments. > > 4. To consider proposed protocol features such as automatic discovery, > enumeration, configuration, and management of storage adapters and devices. > > 5. To discuss what collaboration with ANSI T10, T11 and T13 is appropriate. > > > BOF Agenda (2 hrs) > 5 min Review of BOF agenda and objectives (D. Lee/M. Bradley) > 20 min IP Storage Goals (D. Nagle/A. Wilson) > 35 min Discussion > 20 min Approaches (5 minutes each) > o Cisco (A. Bechtolsheim) > o Adaptec (A. Wilson) > o ISI's NetSCSI (?) > o Other (?) > 10 min Proposed charter (D. Lee/M. Bradley) > 30 min Discussion > > > > > > > ----- End Included Message ----- > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:21 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |