|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: ATA/IP & ATAPII should clarify. It seems there are two options here: 1) Rewrite the BIOS and OS ATA drivers to support ATA/IP 2) Have some hardware that bridges between ATA/ISA, which is what current BIOSes and ATA drivers expect, and ATA/IP. There is a middle ground perhaps where the BIOS emulates the old ATA/ISA interface. This is already done with USB to support USB keyboards and mice on legacy OSes. -Costa On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Bradley, Mark wrote: > From what you write below, it seems you envision some ATA chip > trying to drive packets onto a wire (perhaps using some strange > bridge). Is this what you mean? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Costa Sapuntzakis [mailto:csapuntz@cisco.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 10:06 AM > > To: Bradley, Mark > > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > > Subject: RE: ATA/IP & ATAPI > > > > > > > > Installed base is a very good argument. :) Here are some of the > > issues: > > > > Many ATA drivers are written to do register-level accesses. Rewriting > > them to send packets will involve some serious reworking. > > > > An ATA/IP device could maintain a register interface to the host with > > a special ATA/ISA<->ATA/IP bridge (either emulated in BIOS or as a > > real PCI device). > > > > Currently, all ATA devices plug into motherboards with > > processors. These processors could act as SCSI<->ATA converters. > > Or are there ATA-only functions that are lost by that sort of > > bridging? > > Perhaps SMART... > > > > Would an ATA/IP device be significantly simpler than a SCSI/IP device > > from a firmware standpoint? > > > > -Costa > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Bradley, Mark wrote: > > > > > About 85% of storage on IA32/64 systems is IDE/ATA. Ignoring > > > this substantial a volume seems inappropriate. Further, there > > > is a proposal for Serial ATA (SAT) that might lend better lend > > > itself to this work. > > > -- markb > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Costa Sapuntzakis [mailto:csapuntz@cisco.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 1:07 AM > > > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > > > > Subject: ATA/IP & ATAPI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > What are the arguments for ATA/IP? > > > > > > > > -Costa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:20 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |