|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
- Subject: Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:09:51 -0700
- cc: Erik.Nordmark@eng.sun.com, csapuntz@cisco.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu, tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov, gibbs@freebsd.org, zaitcev@metabyte.com, drich@fjst.com
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Delivery-Date: Thu Feb 24 19:09:25 2000
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:57:10 PST." <200002242357.PAA16973@pizda.ninka.net>
- Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:59:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@Eng.Sun.COM>
>
>As an aside I think the RDMA proposal has a lot of holes too. For
>example, there are in-kernel HTTP accelerators that do the complete
>client header parse and initial packet response in the hw interrupt
>handler. There are no user buffers involved, and static response
>data is DMA'd directly from the filesystem page cache.
In the case of a server response, RDMA benefits the client, not the
server, so I fail to see why your example is problematic. Zero copy
send is not what this standard addresses.
--
Justin
- Prev by Date:
Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- Next by Date:
Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- Prev by thread:
Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- Next by thread:
Re: TCP RDMA option to accelerate NFS, CIFS, SCSI, etc.
- Index(es):
Home
Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:20 2001
6315 messages in chronological order
|