|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: iSCSI has already been done before, sort of...> > > I think the question is whether there is a document similar to iSCSI for IPI > over a network that we could learn from. My problem with the actual IPI-3 > document is that I believe it is similar in scope to the SCSI documents > themselves - good at defining the protocol for the traditional storage > model, but not good at highlighting the changes/issues associated with > putting it over a network. > > If there was a iIPI (IPI-3 over some network) document(s) out there, then > that could provide some useful guidance. > > If I am mistaken, and the actual IPI-3 documents provide this level of > guidance, then it would probably help others to identify the appropriate > sections, since the document itself is rather large. I don't believe that there have ever been any public specs in this area. I know of a couple of implementations of IPI-3 over both TCP/IP and Hippi raw framing protocol- but I don't recall that they got to any kind of standardization level (possibly in the Hippi specs somewhere- I don't have them handy). Anybody on the list know anyone from MaxStrat (mass storage for SuperComputer's company- maybe bought by Sun???? I think they may have also done this as well. -matt
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:09 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |