Re: storage-device QoS [was: IPS Draft Charter update]

["Mark A. Carlson" <mark.carlson@central.sun.com>]

julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> I agree that QoS (and the way storage will want to define SLAs) will be
> important to this group and there is no other forum where we can leverage
> QoS better than IETF.
> 
> However I think that for practical reasons we should postpone this until
> after we are able to outline our discovery, basic management interaction
> with "control points" etc.

Agreed.

> 
> The SLA issue is getting more mature and IETF is better positioned to
> handle it
> than any other standards body.
> 
> I think that our chairmen would like to add a "Phase 3" to our schedule to
> do this.

Sounds good to me.

-- mark