|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: multiple TCP connectionsSteve, Ethernet links are fine between switches and end-points that do this multilink. On other media (WAN) this is not done. Also on Ethernet when you have several NICS host Ethernet drivers have to do the "striping" (and most don't do it). Regards, Julo "Steve Byan" <steve_byan@hotmail.com> on 02/08/2000 22:14:22 Please respond to "Steve Byan" <steve_byan@hotmail.com> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: (bcc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM) Subject: Re: multiple TCP connections Sorry, I didn't understand TCP multihoming. I've been reading RFC 1122 and RFC 1123 and discovered that TCP binds to exactly one of the local multihomed addresses, and that TCP applications must choose exactly one of the multihomed addresses for the remote host. Multiple sessions starts to make much more sense. I noticed that there is a standard for ethernet link aggregation (IEEE 802.3ad), and that routers are available that will load-balance over a set of links. Given these two, it seems to me that multiple TCP connections aren't needed for speed or reliability, assuming ethernet links at the end-points. Am I still missing something? The argument that makes sense to me is that of parallelizing the TCP load across multiple hardware accelerators. Thanks. Regards, -Steve Steve Byan <stephen.byan@quantum.com> ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:03 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |