Re: FCoverIP (FC/SCTP/IP)

[Spencer Shepler <shepler@eng.sun.com>]

Douglas Otis wrote:
> 
> Here is an updated version so less is missing...
> 
>                                                   
...

>                                        Name: draft-ietf-ips-fc-sctp-ip-00.txt
>    draft-ietf-ips-fc-sctp-ip-00.txt    Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
>                                    Encoding: 7bit

Douglas Otis,
  As a document editor for the NFSv4 WG I would like to
make a couple of friendly observations/suggestions.
  First, your draft is not at this point a WG document and
therefore is mis-named.  It is a personal draft and therefore
should be named 'draft-otis-fc-sctp-ip-00.txt' or something
like that.
  Second, if you have not already reviewed the "Guidelines to Authors
of Internet-Drafts" (http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt),
I suggest that you do.
  Third, it is considered poor form to forward a draft directly
to the WG, especially before it has been published on the IETF site.
It is okay to announce the availability of a draft or after the
draft name has been established to announce that you have submitted
an updated version.  Personal experience has shown the IETF draft
publication process to be reasonably responsive.  Give it a chance.

Spencer