SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    FW: Target Reset handling



    Abject apologies if this is a duplicate.  Since I never received a copy from
    the ips mailing list or spotted the message in the ips archive, I figured
    this may have been missent or lost in transit.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Charles Monia 
    Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:18 PM
    To: Julian Satran (E-mail)
    Cc: Ips (E-mail)
    Subject: RE: Target Reset handling
    
    
    A word to the wise:
    
    There are a number of features in the SCSI Architecture that are not widely
    supported by existing implementations. Asynchronous event notification and
    auto-contingent allegiance are among them.
    
    For that reason, relying on SCSI Asynchronous Event Notification, as
    mentioned below, along with the auto-contingent-allegiance mechanism for
    device synchronization discussed in another thread should be viewed with
    caution.
    
    As a design goal, at the level of the storage device abstraction, every
    effort should be made to remain within the mainstream of features supported
    by deployed SCSI implementations.
    
    Charles
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com [mailto:julian_satran@il.ibm.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:04 AM
    > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: RE: Target Reset handling
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > James,
    > 
    > The intent of the reset is radical - and assumes that something is bad
    > at the target. Initiator May (or should?) be advised by AE on this
    > happening.
    > The TCP sessions are closed to eliminate any zombies (how 
    > gracefully it is
    > up to the
    > implementer - but he should at least make sure that the AE gets to the
    > initiators
    > if he decides to signal it (although this might not be very useful).
    > 
    > And what you describe at 2 might happen but then some resources are
    > overcomitted
    > and that is an administrative issue.
    > 
    > I have the feeling that I am not understanding exactly the 
    > scenario you are
    > concerned
    > with.  Are there initiators waiting to be connected before 
    > the reset that
    > can't get
    > connected?   Are the host sockets over committed? In this 
    > case you might
    > want to have
    > the iSCSI drivers have some pre-allocated ranges of sockets.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Julo
    > 
    <lots of stuff deleted>
    
    Charles Monia
    Senior Technology Consultant
    Nishan Systems Corporation
    email: cmonia@nishansystems.com
    voice: (408) 519-3986
    fax:   (408) 435-8385
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:36 2001
6315 messages in chronological order