|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] FW: Target Reset handlingAbject apologies if this is a duplicate. Since I never received a copy from the ips mailing list or spotted the message in the ips archive, I figured this may have been missent or lost in transit. -----Original Message----- From: Charles Monia Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:18 PM To: Julian Satran (E-mail) Cc: Ips (E-mail) Subject: RE: Target Reset handling A word to the wise: There are a number of features in the SCSI Architecture that are not widely supported by existing implementations. Asynchronous event notification and auto-contingent allegiance are among them. For that reason, relying on SCSI Asynchronous Event Notification, as mentioned below, along with the auto-contingent-allegiance mechanism for device synchronization discussed in another thread should be viewed with caution. As a design goal, at the level of the storage device abstraction, every effort should be made to remain within the mainstream of features supported by deployed SCSI implementations. Charles > -----Original Message----- > From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com [mailto:julian_satran@il.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:04 AM > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: Target Reset handling > > > > > James, > > The intent of the reset is radical - and assumes that something is bad > at the target. Initiator May (or should?) be advised by AE on this > happening. > The TCP sessions are closed to eliminate any zombies (how > gracefully it is > up to the > implementer - but he should at least make sure that the AE gets to the > initiators > if he decides to signal it (although this might not be very useful). > > And what you describe at 2 might happen but then some resources are > overcomitted > and that is an administrative issue. > > I have the feeling that I am not understanding exactly the > scenario you are > concerned > with. Are there initiators waiting to be connected before > the reset that > can't get > connected? Are the host sockets over committed? In this > case you might > want to have > the iSCSI drivers have some pre-allocated ranges of sockets. > > Regards, > Julo > <lots of stuff deleted> Charles Monia Senior Technology Consultant Nishan Systems Corporation email: cmonia@nishansystems.com voice: (408) 519-3986 fax: (408) 435-8385
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:36 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |