RE: iSCSI Autosense Consensus, Connection next steps

[Peter Johansson <PJohansson@ACM.org>]

At 04:31 PM 9/5/00, Douglas Otis wrote:

>Microsoft assumes the SCSI interface is SCSI-II as example.

I don't know what this has to do with the discussion about autosense. 
Microsoft implements SBP-2 in the more recent Windows OS; SBP-2, if used to 
transport SCSI commands and status, requires autosense; inductively, there 
is no conflict between this sensible requirement of a packetized protocol 
(SBP-2) and a belief that Microsoft assumes SCSI-2 behavior.




Regards,

Peter Johansson

Congruent Software, Inc.
98 Colorado Avenue
Berkeley, CA  94707

(510) 527-3926
(510) 527-3856 FAX

PJohansson@ACM.org