SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: Multiple Connections. How would they work?



    
    As I read it, the model in 01 was a "single" model, not a "symmetric"
    model.  It did not place any limit on the number of "singles", but
    did not place any relationship values among them either.  That makes
    ordering exactly the same as the present SCSI structure, which may
    have any number of initiator/target connections and paths, but treats
    each one of them as individual and, for most purposes, independent.
    
    That is a model I would favor, since I see no way to create
    interdependent paths without objectionable and expensive relationships
    being maintained among hardware NICs in  either the hardware or
    software layers.  These relationships have typically been handled
    very well and in highly optimized ways by wedge drivers and
    high availability file systems.
    
    Bob
    
    >  The 00 draft (Adelaide) had the commands go down over one 
    >  specific control
    >   stream while the data went on any available connection.
    >  Synchronizing them and providing for hardware implementation 
    >  across several
    >  adapters was felt to be complex.
    >  
    >  However command ordering was trivial.
    >  
    >  The symmetric model in 01 requires ordering and this is why 
    >  you have the
    >  command ordering.
    >  A proposal to get back to the asymmetric model but decide 
    >  ahead of time (?
    >  when) what
    >  path data will be taking was forwarded by Kalman.
    >  
    >  We call this the asymmetric model (it can still evolve).
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:28 2001
6315 messages in chronological order