SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: FCIP and wandering duplicates



    Vivek,
    
    In a properly implemented FC-only fabric, duplicates should not happen. A
    frame that enters a fabric should either be delivered within E_D_TOV
    (typically 2 sec) or be discarded. FC devices don't retransmit a frame
    before the E_D_TOV timer expires.
    
    You do bring up an interesting point when two SAN islands are bridged across
    an IP network. Once an FC frame enters the IP network, it is hard to say how
    the E_D_TOV is enforced by that part of the network. As authors of the
    FCoverIP draft, we have given some thought to the possibility of delivering
    duplicate frames when both the TCP stack at the FCIP gateway and the
    original FC device initiate recovery/retransmission procedure in an
    overlapping time period. This is one of the major reasons why we initially
    chose to make the FCIP gateway a stateless device with no buffering and no
    retransmission.
    
    The good news is that the {IP encapsulated} FC frame will be protected by
    the IP TTL once it enters the IP network. The bad news is that detecting the
    E_D_TOV timeout while the frame is inside the IP network may be difficult.
    
    Regards,
    
    Raj Bhagwat
    LightSand Communications
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vivek Kashyap <viv@sequent.com>
    To: <ipfc@standards.gadzoox.com>
    Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 3:17 PM
    Subject: FCIP and wandering duplicates
    
    
    > I read the FCIP document recently. It does not address the issue of
    > duplicates.
    >
    > Does fibre channel protect itself from duplicates ? I looked at the
    > header and it does not have a time to live field. Thus a duplicate
    > caught in a loop and then released at the 'right' time could be
    > accepted by the receiver. Even if the FC fabric path algorithms do
    > ensure loop free paths transient loops due to errors, switch
    > misconfigurations or failures are possible. Does FC handle such a case ?
    >
    > If it does not then FCIP will exacerbate the problem because the IP
    > network could have 'transient' loops. Such a 'wandering duplicate'
    > could be re-injected into the FC island and be accepted by a newer
    > incarnation of a FC inter-island exchange. Furthermore with no TTL one
    > can't really provide a timout between starting two conversations.
    >
    >
    >
    > Vivek
    > --
    > Vivek Kashyap
    > IBM-NumaQ
    > viv@sequent.com
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:25 2001
6315 messages in chronological order