Re: iSCSI: 2.2.6. Naming & mapping

[julian_satran@il.ibm.com]

Not again (what is the sign for frustration?)... I mean not before the next
version.

Julo

Raghavendra Rao <Jp.Raghavendra@EBay.Sun.COM> on 14/09/2000 21:04:02

Please respond to Raghavendra Rao <Jp.Raghavendra@EBay.Sun.COM>

To:   Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
cc:
Subject:  iSCSI: 2.2.6. Naming & mapping





I feel that a LUN should be very much part of the Naming scheme
that has been proposed in the draft, regardless of the level of
enforcement of the scheme by implementors. LUNs are very much
part of SCSI addressing, and where LUN doesn't exist, zero is
assumed.

Without a LUN identifier, Naming section doesn't look complete.

Do you have insights why it is omitted ? Is this by design or overlook ?

Thanks.
-JP