|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: ISCSI: flow control> >The question here is whether iSCSI should attempt to solve > the command queue > >overflow problem, or allow T10 to deal with it. Other > protocols (fibre > >channel) already deal with it in the "ugly" fashion - > perhaps so should > >iSCSI. What we need consensus on is whether or not iSCSI > is going to deal > >with this. > > The "ugly" mechanism is undesirable for a variety of reasons > including fast > convergence / recovery upon data loss. A credit system is simple to > implement and provides a way to bound this problem and the > implementation > complexity (whether in software or hardware or if operating > across a set of > adapters). With a single connection implementation, this > is trivial to > accommodate and future multi-port or multi-adapter solutions > can take > advantage of it as you note with minimal effort. Given this > does not > really impact a single connection solution, what compelling > reason is there > for removing its definition / requirement within the spec at > this point? Actually, the ugly problem is not made much less ugly by having a credit system. The problem is that the command receipt resources of a "target" are oversubscribed during periods of high activity on a properly configured system simply because of the statistical characteristics of storage access. The command resources are also shared among multiple sessions. The only way to guarantee credit is to share the credit out among the multiple sessions. This necessarily leaves a lot of unused resources lying around for sessions that are not very busy at a given instant and unnecessarily limits the capabilities of those sessions that are busy and would otherwise be able to make constructive use of those resources. The result is higher latencies and lower throughputs than you would hope. What you really need is dynamic credit allocation, which will always leave the possibility that a particular session may find itself oversubscribed and forcing busy indications. Which is effectively the mechanism SCSI uses today. Bob Snively Brocade Communications Phone 408 487 8135 1745 Technology Drive San Jose, CA 95110 Email rsnively@brocade.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:08 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |