|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: New List: rdma@cisco.com: to discuss RDMA> -----Original Message----- > From: csapuntz@cisco.com [mailto:csapuntz@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 10:16 AM > To: Jim Williams > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; csapuntz@cisco.com > Subject: Re: New List: rdma@cisco.com: to discuss RDMA > > > > Does anybody on the list object to specifying an RDMA mechanism for > use with iSCSI? Does anybody on the list object to mandating an RDMA > mechanism? Please include your reasons. > I'd object to mandationg the use of RDMA in iSCSI. However, I would support structuring the spec so that an RDMA transport mechanism could be used underneath (I guess that's motherhood). If the iSCSI folks decided this wasn't a priority issue, that's ok with me too. Charles
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:02 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |