|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: New List: rdma@cisco.com: to discuss RDMAcsapuntz@cisco.com wrote: > > Does anybody on the list object to specifying an RDMA mechanism for > use with iSCSI? Does anybody on the list object to mandating an RDMA > mechanism? Please include your reasons. Mandate: strongly against. Recommend: neutral, slightly favorable. Unless... By `mandate' you mean supporting a TEXT flag com.cisco.RDMAEnableRFCxxxx: goforit to which the target can respond com.cisco.RDMAEnableRFCxxxx: nowaybuddy because the target does not have enough system privilage to alter any TCP options. Daniel Smith. -- IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099, USA K65B/C2 Phone: +1(408)927-2072 Fax: +1(408)927-3010
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:02 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |