Re: Status summary on multiple connections

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Status summary on multiple connections
From: Stephen Bailey <steph@cs.uchicago.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:26:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM> of "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:46:26 PDT." <FFD40DB4943CD411876500508BAD027905B811@sj5-ex2.brocade.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

> A third alternative does exist and may be preferable.  That is
> to reflect the present broad usage of SCSI that uses wedge drivers
> to achieve parallelization, bandwidth aggregation, and high availability.
> By that definition, the proper number of connections per I_T nexus
> is one and the proper number of connections per session is also one.

I agree with Bob on this.

Steph

References:
- RE: Status summary on multiple connections
  - From: Robert Snively <rsnively@Brocade.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: LU access through an iSCSI session
Next by Date: Re: VI (Was: Avoiding deadlock in iSCSI)
Prev by thread: RE: Status summary on multiple connections
Next by thread: RE: Status summary on multiple connections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:00 2001
6315 messages in chronological order