|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: URL scheme
I would like to propose the following requirement for any naming scheme.
* Any naming scheme proposed MUST support multiple targets behind a single
IP address
* Any naming scheme proposed SHOULD support multiple targets behind
a single port. This helps make traffic analysis easier.
Consider the topology pictured below. An initiator is connected
to a private network that has a gateway to the Internet. Similarly,
the target is connected to a private network which is connected
by another gateway to the Internet.
Initiator - Private Network - Gateway 1
\
\
Internet
/
/
Target - Private Network - Gateway 2
(bob) |
Target (fred)
How does the Initiator get to talk to the Target bob?
-------------
Current model
-------------
SCSI device identifier is a string in two parts: a hostname and a host-specific
name (HSN). The hostname is either a domain name or an IPv4 or IPv6 address.
Steps:
0) Configuration mechanism tells initiator to talk to SCSI device
identifier "bob"
1) Do a DNS (or other name service) lookup on bob.
Reply arrives with IP address of Gateway #2
2) TCP connect to gateway #2 on well known iSCSI port
3) As part of first login packet, send "Target: bob"
4) Gateway #2 resolves the name "bob" on the internal
network and gets the private IP address of the Target Bob
5) Gateway #2 opens a TCP connection to Target Bob and
passes all traffic between connections
Third party command from bob to fred
0) Configuration tells initiator that bob should talk to
SCSI device identifier "fred"
1) Initiator sends command to bob which has SCSI device identifier
"fred"
2) Bob resolves fred's name and gets Fred's private Ip address
3) Bob connects to Fred and they do their thing
Refinements
-----------
Configuration mechanism (e.g. LDAP server) in step 0, along with
returning the SCSI device identifier "bob", also returns the IP
address of gateway #2. The DNS lookup in #1 is avoided.
DNS lookup of bob actually returns gateway #1 (would work for
iSCSI and HTTP/1.1 but unlikely to work for other protocols).
Gateway #1 then looks up the name on the Internet and gets
gateway #2... and so on...
----------------
IP address model
----------------
A target name is made of two parts: an IP address and a target ID.
The target ID can be either a string or a fixed-length binary
quantity. The target ID is not necessarily globally unique; it
can be IP-address specific.
Step 0) Initiator queries the configuration mechanisms and gets
the IP address of gateway #2 and the target ID for bob.
Step 1) Open TCP connection to IP address of gateway #2 on well-known
iSCSI port
Step 2) As part of first login packet, initiator send the target ID for bob
Step 3) Gateway #2 opens connection to bob based on the target ID
Step 4) Gateway #2 passes all info between connections
Third party commands - passable way
--------------------
Step 0) Configuartion mechanism tells initiator that bob should talk
to fred. The configuration mechanism tells the initiator about the
private IP address/target ID of Fred as seen by Bob (how does it find
this out??)
Step 1) Initiator sends third party command with Fred's IP address
and target ID
Step 2) Bob opens connection to Fred's IP address+port
Third party commands - icky way
--------------------
Step 0) Configuartion mechanism tells initiator that bob should talk
to fred. The configuration mechanism tells the initiator about the
IP address of gateway #2 and target ID of fred
Step 1) Initiator sends third party command with IP address of gateway#2
and target ID of fred
Step 2) Gateway #2 intercepts the third party command and rewrites it
to have Fred's private IP address (based on the target ID)
Step 3) Bob opens connection to Fred's private IP address on well known iSCSI
port, sends target ID in the first iSCSI PDU, etc.
or
Step 2) Bob opens a connection to gateway #2's IP address and passes target
ID
Step 3) Bob gets redirected to Fred (or... gateway opens connection
to Fred and passes all commands between Fred & Bob)
In this approach, the gateway must be able to map a target ID to an IP address
and a (possibly new) target ID.
Note on using port numbers instead of target IDs
------------------------------------------------
The only thing that changes in the analysis above is that the target
ID need not be sent on connection open, since the destination port
number on the TCP connection identifies the target.
In this specific scenario, it seems to me that using strings entirely
is cleaner than passing IP addresses which are potentially non-sensical.
-Costa
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:51 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |