Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)

To: "Jim Hafner/Almaden/IBM" <hafner@almaden.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
From: csapuntz@cisco.com
Date: 04 Oct 2000 16:04:33 -0700
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Cc: csapuntz@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: "Jim Hafner/Almaden/IBM"'s message of "Wed, 4 Oct 2000 14:57:19 -0700"
References: <OF54CC0427.2F60B7DA-ON8825696E.006DAB97@LocalDomain>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


Jim,

I like your CONNECT message proposal quite a bit. Making the CONNECT
message the first message of the TCP connection will simplify the
gateway's implementation.

However, I worry about gateways that would like to authenticate the
initiator prior to allowing the connection to proceed. Do you have any
thoughts on how to make that work well?

-Costa

Follow-Ups:
- RE: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
  - From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>

References:
- iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
  - From: "Jim Hafner/Almaden/IBM" <hafner@almaden.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: LUs, GUIDs, LUNs
Next by Date: Re: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
Prev by thread: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
Next by thread: RE: iSCSI: CONNECT message (was Naming/Discovery/URLs)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:50 2001
6315 messages in chronological order