Re: iSCSI Naming and Discovery

[julian_satran@il.ibm.com]

I agree. I think that at this stage we should limit ourselves to naming a
target (and view).

Julo

"John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM" <hufferd@us.ibm.com> on 07/10/2000 02:32:10

Please respond to "John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM" <hufferd@us.ibm.com>

To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
cc:    (bcc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM)
Subject:  Re: iSCSI Naming and Discovery




Jim Hafner,
I wish you would NOT get "...down off the pulpit...".  This group seems to
need your preaching that LU names do NOT go into the Name Service.  Please
keep it up.  I will look to you to be the anointed person to keep up the
preaching, and the drum beat, so the rest of us can send our flames to
other areas.  This is the area that you know cold, and I, and I hope the
rest of the team,  will be looking to you for continuing guidance in this
area as well as the related areas of  SCSI Access Controls, and Extended
Copy etc.

.
.
.
John L. Hufferd
Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
(408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403
Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com


Jim Hafner/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS@ece.cmu.edu on 10/06/2000 02:24:42 PM

Sent by:  owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


To:   David Robinson <David.Robinson@EBay.Sun.COM>
cc:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject:  Re: iSCSI Naming and Discovery




David,

You wrote:


<snip>
>The partial source of
>my confusion is others wishing to lookup the LU in a nameservice,
>not just the target.

And that's the confusion I keep trying to clear up!  Any reference to LU in
any nameservice is NOT needed! [I'll get down off the pulpit now, even
though there's still a lot I can say here.]

>Again, my fault, we are in complete agreement.

Great!
Jim Hafner