|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iSCSI: Question on StatRN usageNow I'm confused - the Pittsburgh draft indicates that StatRN usage is optional. When did it become mandatory? <!--StartFragment-->Responses in transit from the target to the initiator are also num- bered. The StatRN (Status Reference Number) is used for this pur- pose. If the target uses data packet numbering and all the inbound data have been acknowledged, or the target is able to regenerate inbound data, then the target may free all the resources allocated for the task execution just after sending a response. The same holds for targets not allowing full command recovery. The result summary, just enough to rebuild the status PDU, will be kept by those iSCSI target implementations that support status recovery Satran, Smith, Sapuntzakis, Meth [Page 5] iSCSI June 2000 after connection failure. As the only cause for long delays in responses can be failed connections and received responses free-up resources, we felt that score boarding responses at the initiator could be accomplished by simple bitmaps and there is no need to flow-control responses. Status acknowledgment is done by the ini- tiator through ExpStatRN (Expected Status RN) and large difference between StatRN and ExpStatRN indicates a failed connection. iSCSI initiators are required to implement the numbering scheme if they support more than one connection. iSCSI targets are not required to use the numbering scheme for ordered delivery even when they support multiple connections. How- ever they are required to provide ExpCmdRN and MaxCmdRN values that will enable the initiator to make progress. <!--EndFragment--> Prasenjit Sarkar Research Staff Member IBM Almaden Research San Jose julian_satran@il.ibm.com@ece.cmu.edu on 10/18/2000 01:57:12 AM Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: Re: iSCSI: Question on StatRN usage Mallikarjun, StatRN implementation is MUST. Its role is to count statuses (responses) that where sent and allow bulk acknowledgement. As such I did not feel any need to place restrictions and 0 is a legal value. As the standard allows 2**32 Initiator Tags you could have 2**32 in flight status responses (! obviously I think it will never happen). Obviously if you know that the target has N outstanding commands and finished commands and it gets from an initiator an ExpStatRN more the N distant from where it is something is wrong! Julo "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com> on 18/10/2000 03:58:54 Please respond to cbm@rose.hp.com To: ips@ece.cmu.edu cc: Subject: iSCSI: Question on StatRN usage Julian, Could you please comment on the following on StatRN usage? Let me know if I am misinterpreting the draft. Current iSCSI draft seems to allow StatRN values from 0 through 2**32-1. It does not qualify the value of 0 as it does for CmdRNs. Assuming that 0 is legal, how would a receiving initiator distinguish between the target implementation that numbers (assigns StatRNs) read data PDUs and the one that doesn't? A StatRN of 0 in a read data packet could be miscontrued and scoreboarded at the initiator, when all the target was saying is that it doesn't implement StatRN for data (assuming that 0 happens to be a legal StatRN at the moment). Options are: - explicitly state that StatRN value of 0 is not legal. This is simple, and my preference. A statRN of 0 in data PDUs in this case indicates non-implementation. - rely on a login dialogue to call out the capability. Even if we choose the first option, I propose introducing a login/text key request/response through which an initiator can ask a target not to number iSCSI data PDUs since he cannot scoreboard all the (potentially unlimited # per each read command) data PDUs. Note that the converse case for target is not critical since target controls the write data transfers and can hope to have scoreboarding room always available. Thanks! -- Mallikarjun M/S 5601 Networked Storage Architecture HP Storage Organization Hewlett-Packard, Roseville. cbm@rose.hp.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:37 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |