SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: new draft



    
    
    JP,
    
    No. If a packet arrives very late and others precede it, or a packet is
    lost and recovered with SACK later
    you end up having to pile-up a lot of data in an adaptor or a separate
    memory area until you can figure where to put it. The amount can be
    minimized if you can rapidly figure out where the next boundary is.
    Obviously you do not really hand the data to the user until you have it all
    but you gain by having a place to store it sooner and minimize the amount
    you have to keep in "temporary storage".
    
    Julo
    
    Raghavendra Rao <jpr@divyaroot.India.Sun.COM> on 08/11/2000 03:23:50
    
    Please respond to Raghavendra Rao <jpr@divyaroot.India.Sun.COM>
    
    To:   Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
    cc:
    Subject:  iSCSI: new draft
    
    
    
    
    
    Julian
    
    I've trouble in interpreting this in the new draft
    
    >   Unfortunately, when relying solely on the "message length in the
    >  iSCSI message" scheme to delineate iSCSI messages, a missing TCP
    >  segment that contains an iSCSI message header (with the message
    >  length) makes it impossible to find message boundaries in subsequent
    >  TCP segments. The missing TCP segment must be received before any
    >   following segments can be processed.
    
    This suggests that TCP might deliver a stream with a missing segment !
    TCP will not deliver to session layer until the missing segment arrives
    to satisfy the streaming protocol it defines.
    
    Have I misread something ?
    
    Thanks
    
    -JP
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:30 2001
6315 messages in chronological order