|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: ISCSI: Urgent Flag requirement violates TCP.Matt Wakeley wrote: > > But that's an argument for iSCSI *not* using TCP services beyond the > > socket API. To use such services the general purpose > > computer running TCP/IP offload would then need to change the > > code in the operating system *and* the code in the ethernet adapter. > > Yeah, what's wrong with that? It sounds to me like you're saying "we > can't make advances in speed and technology because we have to > change the OS". I am saying that the WG needs to be more upfront about its proposal to alter TCP. To "make an advance in speed and technology" by altering the services offered by TCP, a draft that updates RFC793 should be issued. The services are listed at the start of RFC793, before the description of the protocol that implements them. If the draft becomes a standards-track RFC then operating system authors can update their TCP implementations to provide the new service. The current iSCSI proposal requires the use of a non-existent TCP service -- that is, the delivery to the application of indexed octets and the delivery of indexed urgent data. RFC793 is plain that the current service is not indexed, but is a stream of octets. Commercially, my belief is that if iSCSI uses a new TCP service then the protocol is constrained to being a cheaper alternative to Fiber Channel for enterprise storage. Whereas the use of existing TCP/IP services allows iSCSI to be used to implement "global storage" (to create some market-speak). As you may have gathered, it is the global storage potential of iSCSI that has attracted me to this WG. Enterprises sharing high-value storage assets, ISPs offering file-system independent backup facilities, etc. Best wishes, Glen -- Glen Turner Network Engineer (08) 8303 3936 Australian Academic and Research Network glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ -- The revolution will not be televised, it will be digitised
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:28 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |