ISCSI: Urgent pointer consensus

[Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>]

Black_David@emc.com wrote:

> I also believe that based on discussion on the list, WG rough consensus
> does NOT exist for requiring this use of the URG flag and Urgent pointer,
> (too many people have objected to making them mandatory), and hence
> the current "MUST" will have to be replaced.

Um, who, besides Doug, has objected?  Seems to me most of the discussion has
been centered around why it would be useful.  Once the reason(s) have been
explained, I don't see too much dissention.

This is also a call to those who support requiring the use of the urgent pointer
to speak up!

-Matt Wakeley
Agilent Technologies