RE: iSCSI: timers

[Charles Monia <cmonia@NishanSystems.com>]

Hi Julo:

FWIW: The timers as currently specified in section 1.2.3 may be deleted.  If
you decide to retain them (which seems doubtful given the current sentiment
in the WG), there are a few issues that need to be addressed however.  So, I
reserve the right to comment later.

Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com [mailto:julian_satran@il.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:39 PM
> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE:iSCSI: timers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Charles,
> 
> That is a bit late. Can I get your view on the timers 
> tomorrow morning my
> time (10 hours ahead of PST).
> I intend to finish corrections during tomorrow (the first day 
> of weekend
> over here).
> 
> Thanks,
> Julo
> 
> Charles Monia <cmonia@NishanSystems.com> on 16/11/2000 22:05:28
> 
> Please respond to Charles Monia <cmonia@NishanSystems.com>
> 
> To:   "Ips (E-mail)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE:iSCSI: timers
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Julo:
> 
> FWIW:
> 
> I'm in the process of reviewing the latest draft, including the timing
> specification. I plan to post comments by 11/17.
> 
> Charles
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com [mailto:julian_satran@il.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:38 AM
> > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> > Subject: timers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > I did not hear anything about the timers for our gateway
> > specialists and
> > I've heard many of you screaming against them (truly only 1
> > or 2 but this
> > is a VAST MAJORITY those days :)-).
> >
> > If nobody (except one) speaks for them I might be tempted to
> > take them out
> > completely.
> >
> > Julo
> >
> >
> 
> 
>