Re: Concensus Call on Urgent Pointer.

["Randall R. Stewart" <randall@stewart.chicago.il.us>]

Dick:

I also like this wording... making it an option for both sides
is I think best...

R

Dick Gahan wrote:
> 
> I agree with Daniel smiths wording.
> 
> >"During login, if the target reqests use of the Urgent Pointer (UP) then
> >.this should be taken as meaning that the target will operate more
> >efficiently when the UP is used.  The initiator should make an effort to use
> >the UP.  If it is unable (or unwilling, because of user intervention*) to
> >use the UP then it must indicate its non-compliance to the target."
> 
> Neither the target or the initiator must support it but either or both can
> request it.
> The requested party does not have to support it to be complient.
> 
> Dick Gahan
> 3com
> 
> I apologize for the advertizing in my last memo - some MIS people have enabled
> this and I havn't had time
> to turn it off.
> 
> Dick
> 
> PLANET PROJECT will connect millions of people worldwide through the combined
> technology of 3Com and the Internet. Find out more and register now at
> http://www.planetproject.com

-- 
Randall R. Stewart
randall@stewart.chicago.il.us or rrs@cisco.com
815-342-5222 (cell) 815-477-2127 (work)