SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: TCP limitations (was Re: ISCSI: Urgent Flag requirement violates TCP.)



    Glen,
    
    Should there be a problem with out of sequence packets due to link
    saturations with alternative routes found or misconfigurations, the use of
    SACK will reduce the load on a link that may already be overloaded.  I
    understand performance of an individual connection will not be significantly
    better as a result.  I was trying to indicate a relative advantage in
    reducing the link demands.
    
    Doug
    
    > Vern Paxson quoted someone who's mail I had already deleted:
    >
    > > > Your assumptions about reordering is not accurate for WAN.
    > Should there be
    > > > more than one long-haul fiber in use, common in metro areas,
    > the disparate
    > > > physical routes may induce out of sequence events.  Is such a
    > case, SACK
    > > > reduces the negative effect.
    >
    > The reordering events should only occur on protection or
    > route changes.  Of course, some ISPs can't manage to configure
    > stable routes :-)
    >
    > It was recognised very early that per-packet load sharing across
    > parallel links leads to packet reordering, so MAC address hashing
    > for switches or IP address hashing for routers has long been standard
    > practice and the default configuration setting.  Packets in the same
    > flow are then sent through the same forwarding path.
    >
    > > SACK as currently deployed does not actually help all that much with
    > > reordering.  The receiver will still generate duplicate acks and the
    > > sender will misinterpret them as indicating packet loss, leading to
    > > a congestion response of halving the sending rate.
    >
    > Our upstream provider misconfigured their links to use per-packet
    > load sharing to the US, believing that maximising link utilitisation
    > improved the end-to-end performance.
    >
    > After we got them to change back to the manufacturer's default setting
    > we got a 70% decrease in FTP times for large files between our performance
    > monitoring systems (Linux 2.2, which has SACK).
    >
    > --
    >  Glen Turner                                 Network Engineer
    >  (08) 8303 3936      Australian Academic and Research Network
    >  glen.turner@aarnet.edu.au          http://www.aarnet.edu.au/
    > --
    >  The revolution will not be televised, it will be digitised
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:21 2001
6315 messages in chronological order