Re: Three states for a binary bit

To: Kaleelazhicathu R R Kumar <kaleelaz@comp.nus.edu.sg>
Subject: Re: Three states for a binary bit
From: George Michaelson <ggm@dstc.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 18:48:29 +1000
cc: RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>, end2end-interest <end2end-interest@ISI.EDU>, ips <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:22:23 +0800." <Pine.OSF.4.21.0012061500280.24991-100000@decunx.comp.nus.edu.sg>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


(As I have said before on end2end), with optical switching coming, why
can't we go back to true phone-wire 'real C not VC' and have IP packets
select wavepaths with complete end2end lamda?

use IP as layering, but use dedicated physical path where possible.

congestion is for bottlenecks, not the norm. if I have glass, and you
have glass, and the path inbetween is glass, then in a timeslice, I 
should have 100% of the path. statmux rules!

(back to reality)

-George

References:
- Re: Three states for a binary bit
  - From: Kaleelazhicathu R R Kumar <kaleelaz@comp.nus.edu.sg>

Prev by Date: Re: Three states for a binary bit (was Re: TCP (and SCTP)sucks on high speed networks)
Next by Date: Re: Three states for a binary bit (was Re: TCP (and SCTP) sucks on high speed networks)
Prev by thread: Re: Three states for a binary bit
Next by thread: Re: Three states for a binary bit (was Re: TCP (and SCTP)sucks on high speed networks)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:07 2001
6315 messages in chronological order