SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iFCP - FCIP merge proposal



    Venkat,
    
    <stuff deleted...>
    > 
    > But as far as I can tell, iFCP requires you to remove devices 
    > that support
    > E_Port, B_Port and FC-AL functionality and replace them with iFCP plus
    > OSPF/BGP/RIP implementaions, which is quite a drastic step 
    > for a deployed
    > SAN to take on. Merging the two would appear to provide both 
    > capabilities.
    > 
    iFCP does not require you to remove anything.  There are implementation
    techniques to connect E_PORTS, Loop ports, and whatever ports you have
    in FC to the iFCP transport.  Merging the two will provide you nothing
    but a very complicated, confusing document describing two dissimilar
    techniques.
    
    Regards,
    
    Josh
    
    > Regards,
    > 
    > Venkat Rangan
    > Rhapsody Networks Inc.
    > http://www.rhapsodynetworks.com
    > 
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
    > Julian Satran
    > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 4:36 PM
    > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: iFCP - FCIP merge proposal
    > 
    > 
    > Dear colleagues,
    > 
    > At yesterdays IPS WG meeting and had no chance to clarify my proposal
    > regarding a merger of FCIP and iFCP into a single effort.
    > 
    > iFCP attempt to provide an IP interconnect for FCP devices. 
    > It has also the
    > capabilty to interconnect FC islands.
    > 
    > FCIP has the narrower scope of connecting only FC islands - 
    > admittedly even
    > FC devices other then FCP.
    > 
    > Given that FCP devices where the main concern of this WG and that iFCP
    > serves a wider purpose than FCIP and will enable not only 
    > tunneling but also
    > migration of FCP devices to IP infrastructure my intention 
    > was to suggest
    > that iFCP should attempt to incorporate those FCIP functions 
    > it does not
    > care about today and those two groups should work towards one 
    > common draft
    > that should cover not only tunneling but also device migration to IP
    > networks.
    > 
    > Julo
    > ______________________________________________________________
    > ______________
    > _________
    > Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : 
    http://explorer.msn.com
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:05 2001
6315 messages in chronological order