SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT

SEARCH

Markers

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Markers
From: "Eddy Quicksall" <esquicksall@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 19:24:21 -0500
Content-Type: text/html
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

Does anyone know why the proposal to use the urgent pointer was not approved?

If I understand the explanation of Markers, I see potential problems.

Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com

http://explorer.msn.com

Prev by Date: RE: iFCP as an IP Storage Work Item
Next by Date: RE: iFCP as an IP Storage Work Item
Prev by thread: RE: Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP
Next by thread: markers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:57 2001
6315 messages in chronological order