Re: Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP
From: David Robinson <David.Robinson@EBay.Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 23:10:12 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
References: <B300BD9620BCD411A366009027C21D9B0D812B@ariel.nishansystems.com> <005101c07816$860593e0$75b30118@orng1.occa.home.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

Murali Rajagopal wrote:
> Now with my TC hat on, I would like to propose that we proceed to solve this
> debate by getting a collective consensus from all folks on merging the two -
> protocol or otherwise.
> 
> Please reply with a  simple "Agree to merge" or "Disagree to merge"
> statement. No long explanations as to why or why not please!

Even with a common encapsulation encoding, I don't believe the two
can be merged in any meaningful sense of the word.

	-David

References:
- RE: iFCP as an IP Storage Work Item
  - From: Charles Monia <cmonia@NishanSystems.com>
- Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP
  - From: "Murali Rajagopal" <muralir@lightsand.com>

Prev by Date: iSCSI : Unsolicited Inbound Commands for initiators.
Next by Date: Re: iSCSI : NOP-OUT & NOP-IN issues.
Prev by thread: Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP
Next by thread: RE: Agree or Disagree to Merge FCIP and iFCP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:57 2001
6315 messages in chronological order