Re: iFCP as an IP Storage Work Item

[Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>]

Joshua Tseng wrote:
> 
> I don't want to stifle any creative technical discussion here,
> but I feel the need to remind everybody that iFCP is positioned
> as a gateway technology only.

If iFCP is a "gateway", that to me means that it will convert FCP to iSCSI. 
In that case, FCP is defined as a standard, and iSCSI is a work in progress by
this group.  Those building such gateways then only have to figure out how to
make one side of the gateway look native to the other.  What is there to
standardize?

-Matt Wakeley
Agilent Technologies