Re: iSCSI : Abort Task Response violates SAM-2.

[Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com>]

Julian,

I will hold off on this till I see the changes in 04. However, I see no
value
add in retaining the "No Task Found" [and its corresponding "Referenced
Task
Tag"] when SAM-2 states that "Function Complete" shall indicate that a
task
was not found or the abort was completed.

Regards,
Santosh


julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:

> Santosh,
>
> I did not that "task not found" will be removed. I said that the
wording
> will match closer the SAM wording.
>
> Julo
>
> Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com> on 15/01/2001 01:03:04
>
> Please respond to Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com>
>
> To:   Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
> cc:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject:  Re: iSCSI : Abort Task Response violates SAM-2.
>
> Julian,
>
> I'm confused by your response on this. What does the "Referenced Task
Tag"
> in the SCSI Task Management Response PDU "clarify" ?
>
> Its description in the draft states :
> "Initiator Task Tag of the task not found".
>
> If the "No Task Found" response is being removed from this section, of

> what use is the "Referenced Task Tag" ?
>
> If the LUN and "Referenced Task Tag" fields are used in the task mgmt
> response pdu to give LUN or task context to the task mgmt response,
> then, this information is already present at the initiator and can
> be looked up based on the Initiator Task Tag from the Task
> Management Response PDU.
>
> Regards,


begin:vcard 
n:Rao;Santosh 
tel;work:408-447-3751
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Hewlett Packard, Cupertino.;SISL
adr:;;19420, Homestead Road, M\S 43LN,	;Cupertino.;CA.;95014.;USA.
version:2.1
email;internet:santoshr@cup.hp.com
title:Software Design Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;21088
fn:Santosh Rao
end:vcard