SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI-related conclusions from Orlando interim Meeting



    
    
    Besides there is no way (no SAM defined way) to order task management
    functions.
    Task management is handled by the task manager while tasks (commands) are
    handled by the
    device server.
    
    Julo
    
    Black_David@emc.com on 22/01/2001 17:58:17
    
    Please respond to Black_David@emc.com
    
    To:   santoshr@cup.hp.com, Black_David@emc.com
    cc:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject:  RE: iSCSI-related conclusions from Orlando interim Meeting
    
    
    
    
    > > - Abort WARNING will be added to the draft.
    > > - Immediate Delivery of Aborts and similar task management commands
    > >   may have unexpected results when multiple TCP connections are in use
    > >   because Abort, Clear Task Set, etc. may bypass command(s) to be
    > >   aborted/cleared on other TCP connections.
    > > - Ordered Delivery should be used instead when this is a concern.
    >
    > Is the above referring to ordered delivery as in CmdSN based ordering or
    > the use of the Ordered Task Tag ?
    
    It's CmdSN, not Task Tag.  Santosh's issues appear to be with the Task
    Tag, which is not what is being pursued.  Using the Task Tag in this
    fashion
    would cause all sorts of problems.
    
    --David
    ---------------------------------------------------
    David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:46 2001
6315 messages in chronological order