|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header DigestsBarry, We are well aware of this catch-22. You'll have to assume the additional length field is OK and then check the CRC. Julo "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> on 22/01/2001 18:40:06 Please respond to "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: Subject: RE: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header Digests Well, If that's the case then you have to use the information in the unchecked header to figure out the how to check the header. -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of julian_satran@il.ibm.com Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 11:00 AM To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header Digests yes, Julo "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> on 22/01/2001 17:49:29 Please respond to "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> To: mbakke@cisco.com, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: RE: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header Digests Ok, So if the bidi-read length and ADDCDB fields are not in the data digest then I assume we have to figure them into the header digest even though they are located past the header digets. Is that the expected behavior? -----Original Message----- From: mbakke@cisco.com [mailto:mbakke@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 10:22 AM To: julian_satran@il.ibm.com Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; Barry Reinhold Subject: Re: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header Digests Barry- In particular, the data digest covers only the SCSI Data part of an iSCSI message; the header digest covers everything else. This means that in an 8k write, the data digest will cover only the 8k, and the header digest will cover everything else. Hope this helps, Mark julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote: > > Barry, > > Considering that one of the reasons to have a separate header and data > digest was to enable data > to carried through proxies, virtualizers etc. the current thinking is that > the data digest will cover only the data and the header (including > extensions) will be covered by the header digest. > > Julo > > "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> on 21/01/2001 21:50:04 > > Please respond to "Barry Reinhold" <bbrtrebia@mediaone.net> > > To: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL > cc: > Subject: Coverage of Data Digest when using Header Digests > > Julian, > Is the Data Digest intended to cover whatever follows the 48 byte > iSCSI > header? In particular in a command frame which has a CDB > 16 bytes, uses > bidi, has immediate data, and is using both header and data digests - what > would the data digest cover? > - barry > reinhold -- Mark A. Bakke Cisco Systems mbakke@cisco.com 763.398.1054
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:46 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |