RE: Security Use Requirements

To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: Security Use Requirements
From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:24:50 -0500 (EST)
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


John asks:
> That 
> is, it could be acceptable to have a gateway box included in the must
> implement.

how would this deal with the case where the "gateway box" is built into 
a device? (i.e. no seperate gateway box)

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Security Use Requirements
  - From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Security Use Requirements
Next by Date: RE: Security Use Requirements
Prev by thread: RE: Security Use Requirements
Next by thread: RE: Security Use Requirements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:34 2001
6315 messages in chronological order