RE: Security Use Requirements

[Michael Eisler <mre@zambeel.com>]

> Mandating additional resources to implement privacy would not allow this to
> be a customer made trade-off.  Allowing it as product feature option would.

Implementors who implement mandatory privacy can choose to allow customers to
toggle privacy on or off. This approach allows customers to make the tradeoff.

If privacy is not mandatory to implement, then customers will inevitably 
encounter the situation where a client-side ips product has privacy and the
server does not, and vice versa. This removes from the customer the ability to
make the trade-off.

	-mre

> > Why not allow the customer to make the tradeoff between security and
> > performance?