Re: R2TDataSN

To: julian_satran@il.ibm.com
Subject: Re: R2TDataSN
From: Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 15:46:10 -0800
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Agilent Technologies
References: <C1256A07.000E8DA0.00@d12mta02.de.ibm.com>
Reply-To: Matt Wakeley <matt_wakeley@agilent.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:
 
> 1.The only consensus I heard is not to transfer a large amount of data with
> one PDU.

Ok, then why do you have "Long Data Header" in the document?

-Matt

References:
- Re: R2TDataSN
  - From: julian_satran@il.ibm.com

Prev by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-cavanna-iscsi-crc-vs-cksum-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: iSCSI: Naming and Discovery Draft...
Prev by thread: RE: iSCSI: Reliability of markers (was Re: R2TDataSN and other recovery mechanisms)
Next by thread: RE: R2TDataSN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:25 2001
6315 messages in chronological order