SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Some gramatical/spelling mistakes in iSCSI draft ver 5



    
    
    Thanks, Julo
    
    "Sanjeev Bhagat (TRIPACE/Zoetermeer)" <sbhagat@tripace.com> on 16/03/2001
    14:35:34
    
    Please respond to "Sanjeev Bhagat (TRIPACE/Zoetermeer)"
          <sbhagat@tripace.com>
    
    To:   "'IPS Reflector'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
    cc:
    Subject:  iSCSI: Some gramatical/spelling mistakes in iSCSI draft ver 5
    
    
    
    
    Sec 1.2.2.1 on page 11
    The sentence
    Not covered in this document are *he means by which the SCSI Layer may
    request immediate delivery for command or by which iSCSI will decide by
    itself to mark a PDU for immediate delivery
    
    I guess he should be changed to the.
    
    Section 1.2.5 on page 16
    It is assumed that these tags are *be used by the target to tag (alone or
    in
    combination with the LUN) the solicited data
    
    "be" should be removed.
    
    Section 2.4.2 on page 36
    If a SCSI device error is detected while data from the initiator is still
    expected (the commadn PDU did not contain all the data and the target has
    not received the *a Data PDU with the F bit set before sending the Response
    PDU
    
    "a" should be removed
    
    Section 2.4.6 on page 37
    One past the largest DataSN in an input (read) data PDU the target has sent
    for the command. 0 means no data PDUs *where sent.
    
    "Where" should be replace with "were"
    
    
    Section 2.4.7 on page 37
    One past the largest DataSN in an R2T PDU the target has sent for the
    command. 0 means no R2T PDUs *where sent.
    
    "Where" should be replace with "were"
    
    I will report more as I find more..
    
    Regards,
    Sanjeev Bhagat
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:18 2001
6315 messages in chronological order