SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iscsi: rev 05 2.5.1 requires ACA support



    > Even with management commands, position within the command stream is
    > assumed.  Should there be commands sent without an ability to verify
    > relative position and with the potential for excessive skews between
    > connections, the use of a zero seems clumsy.  It could apply to command
    not
    > yet received on different connections.  Even though a command may have a
    > sequence value, it could be 'Marked' for immediate use without strict
    > adherence to sequence.  The sequence value could be used to filter late
    > comers, perhaps the cause for the management command in the first place.
    > The task attribute could be used to understand if there is a need for
    > immediate application or an iSCSI specific bit if that is too difficult.
    
    This sounds like what ordered delivery is currently specified to do,
    possibly
    coupled with a note to implementers suggesting that task management
    commands be executed promptly after delivery to SCSI.  An example of
    a scenario that may work with immediate delivery ("use of a zero" above)
    is one in which some person or piece of software has determined or
    suspects that something undesirable is going on in/at the target device
    and wants it stopped NOW!!! (e.g., "What on earth is that tape robot
    doing???").
    
    --David
    ---------------------------------------------------
    David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:17 2001
6315 messages in chronological order