|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] iSCSI: LUs ownership/iSCSI MIBMark (bakke), Where ===== In the MIB draft, in the chapter 5.1. Overall MIB structure There is: "Therefore, LUs are "owned" by Targets, and LUNs are owned by Sessions." Problem ====== If a LU is owned by only one target how do you deal with an active-passive configuration such as: active link: portal IP1, LUN=1 passive: portal IP2, LUN=2 (but it is the same LU as the one accessed through the active link) As the various portals of a target provide the same LUN view, IP1 and IP2 can NOT be two portals of the same target. In this case we would need two target names, one for the active link and one for the passive. But if a LU can be owned by only one target we can't do it. I think SAM doesn't allows a LU to be shared by two targets and that seems to be reflected in the chapter "5.1. Overall MIB structure". Solution ====== In the case of an active-passive configuration, the target must guarantee the same view on the two paths (active and passive). Is it a problem for whose who build such targets? Regards, Pierre
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:16 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |