|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: TCP framing and SCTP Checksum: TSVWG onlyDoug - please follow instructions from your WG co-chair. Both TCP framing and SCTP Checksums are tsvwg topics and need to be taken up there. If solutions emerge there, they can be adopted by reference here - you can be assured that you're not the only person on both mailing lists. --David > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Otis [SMTP:dotis@sanlight.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 7:37 PM > To: Black_David@emc.com > Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: TCP framing and SCTP Checksum: TSVWG only > > David, > > The various proposals on the table for either iFCP or FCIP encapsulation > may > benefit from utilization of a generalized framing layer suitable for both > TCP and SCTP. In that respect, I thought it advantageous to consider > these > aspects. This goes into the generalized aspects of extended error > detection, frame validation, higher level retry on a digest failure, and > identification of the underlying payload and was my reasoning for > including > this within the IPS WG. I understand if this proposal is to proceed on a > standards path, it will be within TSVWG. If there is no interest within > this WG, then it will not be mentioned further. > > Doug > > > > Both TCP framing and SCTP checksums are topics > > specific to TSVWG - please post on these only > > to the tsvwg list and do not cross-post to the > > ips list, as we already have more than enough > > traffic. > > > > Thanks, > > --David > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > > +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 > > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:58 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |