SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI : target session login behaviour



    "Mudaliar, Hari" wrote:
    > 
    > Santosh,
    >         I get your point. But what if there is more than one iSCSI Host bus
    > adapter in a system? The Initiator Name will be the same and ISID MAY turn
    > out to be the same (unless the ISIDs are apportioned between the initiators
    > through some configuration method). 
    
    HBAs that offload session mgmt are required to accept the ISID from the
    node (in this context, the host O.S. driver). This allows the node to
    maintain uniqueness of the ISID within its space.
    
    The name-disc draft explicitly states in Section    :
    
    "The SCSI Initiator Port Name and SCSI Initiator Port  Identifier are
    the iSCSI Initiator Node name together with the ISID  of the session
    identifier."
    
    <snip snip>
    
    "There can be only one iSCSI session with a given ISID between an iSCSI
    Intiator Node and an iSCSI Target Node."
    
    <snip snip>
    
    "There can be multiple SCSI Port objects present in an  iSCSI Storage
    Node object (one for each session created). In software iSCSI
    representations, the iSCSI Storage Node object creates a session process
    which, in turn, represents the SCSI Port. By making the SCSI Port be a
    separate object from the iSCSI Node object, it allows one to use
    different combinations of software and hardware iSCSI implementations
    within the same iSCSI node umbrella. Moreover, this also allows the
    iSCSI Node name at the initiators to be associated with the operating
    system footprint and not with any network card hardware (such as the
    iSCSI offload network card). In hardware iSCSI offload card
    implementations, the session process is present in the iSCSI network
    card. The iSCSI Node object passes the unique iSCSI Node name and the
    ISID or the TSID to the session process."
    
    - Santosh
    
    
    
    
    > This assumes that multiple sessions can
    > exist between one initiator system (containing multiple iSCSI off-load
    > engines/HBAs) and a target.
    > 
    > - Hari
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Santosh Rao [mailto:santoshr@cup.hp.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:18 PM
    > To: Mudaliar, Hari
    > Cc: IPS Reflector
    > Subject: Re: iSCSI : target session login behaviour
    > 
    > "Mudaliar, Hari" wrote:
    > 
    > >         I am assuming that you are referring to the creation of a new
    > > session with TSID=0 in your example below. Take the case of an initiator
    > I1
    > > who has established a session with a target with an ISID=ISID1. What if a
    > > second initator I2 tries to login to the same target with ISID1? The
    > target
    > > cannot decide to logout the first initiator (who already has a session
    > > established with ISID1) as suggested by you.
    > 
    > Hari,
    > 
    > You may want to take a second look at my mail. It specifically refers to
    > the problem in the context of a given (Initiator Name, ISID). Your
    > example above does not fall under that category. A 2nd initiator using
    > the same ISID would have a different Initiator Name. (a.k.a initiator
    > WWUI).
    > 
    > The problem raised is in the context of an existing session for a given
    > (Initiator Name, ISID). How does a target deal with a second session
    > login received for the same (Initiator Name, ISID) with a NULL TSID ?
    > 
    > >         Also, depending on implementation, the target may realize that the
    > > TCP connections for a session were lost (using Keep-Alives or iSCSI NOPs
    > > etc.) when the initiator rebooted thus terminating the session. By the
    > time
    > > a new login from the same initiator is received, the old session info may
    > > have been cleared.
    > 
    > Then again, it may not. There's 2 aspects to this issue :
    > 1) Successful session re-logins from the rebooted host.
    > 2) Garbage collection and cleanup of the old session resources.
    > 
    > (1) is a more serious issue, since the target MUST NOT reject the login
    > based on a pre-existing active session for a given (Initiator Name,
    > ISID).
    > 
    > (2) is handled through garbage collection algorithms, but implementation
    > of the proposal would help accelerate the release of stale session
    > resources.
    > 
    > - Santosh
    > 
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Santosh Rao [mailto:santoshr@cup.hp.com]
    > > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:19 AM
    > > To: IPS Reflector
    > > Subject: iSCSI : target session login behaviour
    > >
    > > All,
    > >
    > > How should a target respond when it receives a session login  [on a new
    > > TCP connection] with the same (ISID, Initiator Name) as a session
    > > already active at the target.
    > >
    > > Does such a login request imply :
    > >
    > > 1) the target should perform implicit logout and re-login of the session
    > > identified by (ISID, initiator name) ?
    > >
    > > 2) Or does this result in the target responding to the session login
    > > with :
    > > a login response with status class of non-zero indicating target is
    > > rejecting the login ?
    > >
    > > [The draft does not describe target behaviour for this scenario.]
    > >
    > > iSCSI session login semantics should explicitly state that the above
    > > scenario will result in case (1) above. i.e. when a target sees a
    > > session login for a given (ISID, initiator name), it MUST treat this as
    > > an implicit logout of any previous session active at the target for that
    > > (ISID, initiator name) and then, establish a new session.
    > >
    > > This is required because the above scenario can typically occur when an
    > > initiator reboots without having performed a session logout on all
    > > active sessions.(system did not perform an orderly shutdown).
    > >
    > > As a side note, the iSCSI draft Status Class/Codes could do with a misc
    > > error category along the lines of the FC "No additional Explantion"
    > > reason explantion. This would help deal with error conditions that don't
    > > come under the listed category.
    > >
    > > - Santosh
    begin:vcard 
    n:Rao;Santosh 
    tel;work:408-447-3751
    x-mozilla-html:FALSE
    org:Hewlett Packard, Cupertino.;SISL
    adr:;;19420, Homestead Road, M\S 43LN,	;Cupertino.;CA.;95014.;USA.
    version:2.1
    email;internet:santoshr@cup.hp.com
    title:Software Design Engineer
    x-mozilla-cpt:;21088
    fn:Santosh Rao
    end:vcard
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:52 2001
6315 messages in chronological order