SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI : EnableACA



    > > What about a command in flight (that
    > > was the first that had a NACA bit)?
    > 
    > Such I/Os would be errored back with "ACA Active" SCSI Status.
    
    Oops. I believe your question was regarding the first NACA set CDB
    in-flight and not yet in the task set at the time of the task mgmt cmd.
    
    Such a scenario implies the I/Os prior to that first NACA set I/O would
    have had no ordering constraints. In this case, no ACA is established for
    the task mgmt cmd prior to the first NACA I/O. [CAC is established.]
    
    The CAC is cleared on the next I/O [other than INQUIRY and REPORT LUNS] 
    that arrives after CAC was established. Subsequent arrival of a NACA set
    I/O is processed normally and no loss of ordering occurs in this case.
    
    Did I miss something about this scenario (?)
    
    Regards,
    Santosh
    
    -- 
    #################################
    Santosh Rao
    Software Design Engineer,
    HP, Cupertino.
    email : santoshr@cup.hp.com
    Phone : 408-447-3751
    #################################
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:48 2001
6315 messages in chronological order