|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: FCIP - Discovery should be Manual/SLPAgree with the use of SLPv2 as the only mandatory discovery mechanism for FCIP, with naming/zoning not being requirements for FCIP. Note that static configuration (as opposed to dynamic discovery method) will be specified in the FCIP MIB, so I would replace the wording below "static config is outside the scope of this specification" to "static config is specified in the FCIP MIB document". Regards, Anil -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Weber [mailto:ralphoweber@compuserve.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:25 PM To: IPS Reflector Subject: FCIP - Discovery should be Manual/SLP I support Dave's proposed text for FCIP Clause 4.2 item 3, with the exception that the sentence regarding iSNS needs to be removed. Looking at the features list, I cannot see any iSNS unique features that are meaningful to FCIP. Thanks. Ralph... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Subject: Proposal to use SLPv2 for FCIP device discovery Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:07:08 -0500 From: "Dave Peterson" <dap@cisco.com> To: "Ips@Ece. Cmu. Edu" <ips@ece.cmu.edu> As requested here is the proposal I presented at Mondays' FCIP meeting: FCIP Draft Proposal For Clause 4.2, item 3. Each FCIP device may be statically or dynamically configured with a list of IP addresses and port numbers corresponding to all the participating FCIP devices. If dynamic discovery of participating FCIP devices is supported this function shall be performed using the Service Location Protocol (SLPv2). For additional FCIP device management capability, the iSNS Internet Storage Naming Service may be implemented. It is outside the scope of this specification to describe any static configuration method for participating FCIP device discovery. Refer to clause XXX for a detailed description of dynamic discovery of participating FCIP device using SLPv2. Notes: 1. DHCP: a. Allows an entity to discovery information about itself, not discover information about all other entities. b. Uses a broadcast mechanism that may not work via routers without additional configuration. But, most current router implementations will support the forwarding of DHCP requests across routed subnets. c. May be used to find SLP Directory Agents and Scope Lists allowing for a more scalable solution. 2. DNS Services are too limiting. This is the reason why SLP was started. 3. LDAP is simply a database interface. SLP and iSNS may use LDAP as a back-end store. 4. SLP FCIP Device Type Specifics a. IP address(es) b. Port numbers(s) c. Scope d. Attributes i. Discovery domain (i.e. a group name or zone name, don't want to use zone name in this context though) ii. need to start listing these (if we can think of any more) e. Lifetime Work In progress: 1. Putting together a model for FCIP device discovery using SLPv2. 2. Implementing a "default/suggested" SLPv2 template. 3. Reviewing RFC 3082 "Notification and Subscription for SLP for enhanced device notification. Requirements SLPv2 iSNS Discovery of FCIP targets Y Y Discovery of FCIP device IP address(es) Y Y Discovery of FCIP port number(s) Y Y Attribute support Y Y Semi-timely notification of devices coming and going Y Y Authentication Y Y* Minimal/no configuration Y Y(?) Provisioning Y Y Multicast support Y N Publicly available source Y N Standardized and mature Y N Lighweight implementation Y N Non-Requirements Zoning N Y State Change Notification N Y Naming Services N Y * uses SLPv2 constructs David Peterson Lead Architect - Standards Development Cisco Systems - SRBU 6450 Wedgwood Road Maple Grove, MN 55311 Office: 763-398-1007 Cell: 612-802-3299 Email: dap@cisco.com
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:37 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |