|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: SLP, iSNS, and iSCSIDavid, > I believe I was also a source of requests to do this, and the > courtesy is appreciated. I think it's now up to the WG to decide > what FCIP discovery/configuration mechanisms to REQUIRE > and/or RECOMMEND in the FCIP draft. Thank you for your explanation, and I agree that it is a WG issue now. Regards, Josh > -----Original Message----- > From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:29 PM > To: jtseng@NishanSystems.com; ips@ece.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: SLP, iSNS, and iSCSI > > > Josh, > > > I'm not a DHCP expert, but in my limited understanding > > of the protocol, the DHCP server is not intelligent > > about who is asking for IP addresses and options. > > There is nothing to identify or authenticate a DHCP > > client making a request (other than the MAC), since it > > doesn't even have an IP address, not to mention an FQDN > > or any other identity. > > I'm not a DHCP expert either, so we may need to go find one. > The following is what I currently understand ... > > I agree with the concern about the scenario in which the > DHCP server is dynamically allocating IP addresses ... > > > If this is true, I am puzzled as to how you can use > > DHCP to manage SLP scopes. The DHCP server can't say > > "device A gets scopes X, Y, and Z", since it doesn't > > even know who device A is. All it can do is hand out > > the same set of scopes to everyone requesting option 79. > > And that's all. So how can you configure a complex set > > of overlapping scopes using a DHCP server??? > > There are at least two existing answers to that question, > both of which involve doing something different to assign > IP addresses: > > (1) Manual Allocation. From Section 1 of RFC 2131: > > In "manual allocation", a client's IP > address is assigned by the network administrator, and DHCP > is used simply to convey the assigned address to the client. > > In other words, the client's IP address is bound to its MAC, > and possibly additional information, such as the subnet on > which that MAC is presented if a DHCP proxy is involved. > A DHCP proxy gets around DHCP's use of link-level broadcasts > that don't propagate through layer 3 (IP) forwarding by proxying > the node issuing the broadcast to the DHCP server. The > DHCP server can see the proxy identity, and hence knows > which subnet is involved. > > (2) DHCP can be used to distribute configuration information > without doing any IP address allocation. This is described > starting in Section 3.4 of RFC 2131, and uses a different > DHCP message from the one used to request IP address > allocation. In particular, a DHCP sever receiving such a > message "MUST NOT check for an existing lease" > (on the IP address). > > Even in the dynamic allocation scenario, knowledge of the > subnet/proxy involved may be enough for the DHCP > server to figure out what the right config parameters > are (e.g., all FCIP devices on the same subnet may be in > the same SLP scope(s), i.e., intended to connect to the > same set of FCIP peers). > > > Lastly, I want to make sure everyone understands that > > support for FCIP is included in the iSNS out of courtesy > > to the FCIP community, and after close consultation with > > several key individuals from that community. Since we > > are not implementing FCIP, I personally am neutral on > > whether it should be used for FCIP, although I do > > believe it would be of great value. > > I believe I was also a source of requests to do this, and the > courtesy is appreciated. I think it's now up to the WG to decide > what FCIP discovery/configuration mechanisms to REQUIRE > and/or RECOMMEND in the FCIP draft. > > Thanks, > --David > > --------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140 FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500 > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > --------------------------------------------------- >
Home Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:37 2001 6315 messages in chronological order |