SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Logout command, or The Initiator's new close()



    I think we must dictate implementation.  Anything other than specifying how
    the close is to work mean interoperability problems.  I vote for Mark's first
    choice:
    
    > The most straight-forward choice might be:
    > 
    >    Initiator sends the logout request, and simply waits for
    >    the response without closing the connection.  The target
    >    sends the logout response, and closes its end of the
    >    connection.  The initiator receives the logout response,
    >    and the FIN from the target, and closes its end of the
    >    connection.
    
    That way, if there are outstanding I/Os that need to be completed or errors
    that must be communicated, the appropriate communication can be completed
    before the TCP connections are destroyed.
    
    -Matt Wakeley
    Agilent Technologies
    
    julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:
    > 
    > Mark,
    > 
    > I don't think that we should dictate implementation.
    > As we assume that nothing is sent after Logout (should we spell this out)
    > and we have to wait
    > for the logout response we can do  a half close and wait or wait and do a
    > full close after seeing the Logout response.
    > The first is faster the second is simpler.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > Julo
    > 
    > Mark Bakke <mbakke@cisco.com> on 26-05-2001 00:43:30
    > 
    > Please respond to Mark Bakke <mbakke@cisco.com>
    > 
    > To:   IPS <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    > cc:
    > Subject:  iSCSI: Logout command, or The Initiator's new close()
    > 
    > Section 2.14 (the logout command) is not clear on how the logout
    > command and response work when the logout request is send on a
    > connection for which it requests termination.  We should probably
    > specify the TCP close behavior of the initiator and target.
    > 
    > The initiator can send the logout request, and either close
    > the current connection, half-close the connection and wait
    > for the logout response (like HTTP/1.0), or leave it open,
    > and close the connection upon receiving the response or the
    > FIN from the target.
    > 
    > Upon receiving the logout request, the target can either
    > close the connection immediately, send the logout response
    > and then close the connection, or send the logout response
    > and wait for the initiator to close the connection upon its
    > receipt of the logout response.
    > 
    > Logout would work best if the initiators and targets all did
    > this in the same manner, choosing one of the above behaviors
    > for the initiator, and a compatible one for the target.
    > 
    > The most straight-forward choice might be:
    > 
    >    Initiator sends the logout request, and simply waits for
    >    the response without closing the connection.  The target
    >    sends the logout response, and closes its end of the
    >    connection.  The initiator receives the logout response,
    >    and the FIN from the target, and closes its end of the
    >    connection.
    > 
    > Any opinions on whether this is best?  This choice does not
    > require the initiator to know that the connection that is being
    > closed is the one it sent the logout response on, but does
    > require the target to send the logout response before it actually
    > closes the connection.
    > 
    > Another behavior that might work would be to say that the target
    > closes all of its connections and does cleanup before sending the
    > logout response, and if the connection on which the request came
    > in is gone, it does not send a response.  An initiator whose
    > connection is closed after sending the logoout request can assume
    > that the request worked.
    > 
    > Anyway, I think that it would be good to clarify this.
    > 
    > --
    > Mark A. Bakke
    > Cisco Systems
    > mbakke@cisco.com
    > 763.398.1054
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:33 2001
6315 messages in chronological order