Re: iSCSI: More draft-06 comments

[Steve Senum <ssenum@cisco.com>]

Matt Wakeley wrote:
> 
> julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> > ++++ although this text has no ambiguity there is still a raging debate
> > between the proponents of an always explicit response (Matt and - in some
> > covoluted form Steph - and those like Steve Senum who whould like a hiatus
> > signaling a default.  The current text let you set none by default.  This
> > can be changed by removing the "  and MAY be selected by omission... "  +++
> 
> I would like the "and MAY be selected by omission..." removed.

If the "NotUnderstood" response exists, I would also like to see
the option of not sending a response of key:none removed.

Steve Senum