SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Wrapping up SendTargets



    I don't see any reason to disallow what Marjorie is asking
    for.  However, we should also decide whether or not a SendTargets
    response may contain a well-known/default/canonical target to
    which the initiator is expected to recursively issue a
    SendTargets command.
    
    Supporting that feature is much more likely to be a problem
    if we want implementations to transition to other discovery
    mechanisms in the future, as well as creating requirements to
    avoid loops.
    
    Any thoughts?
    
    --
    Mark
    
    Black_David@emc.com wrote:
    > 
    > I think Marj and I understand each other.  The issue
    > comes down to exactly this Q&A at the end of
    > Marj's previous email:
    > 
    > > > David
    > > Marj
    > 
    > > > Do you see a
    > > > need for a SendTargets issued to system X to
    > > > return information about system Y?
    > >
    > > No, but I see no reason to prohibit this.
    > 
    > The potential reason to prohibit this is to limit the
    > use of SendTargets to having a target system describe
    > itself, which I thought was the sense of the discussion.
    > If we don't limit SendTargets to that use, it will get
    > used in the above fashion that has one target system
    > describing others.
    > 
    > In my opinion, this is a decision that we get to make
    > exactly once - if we allow use of SendTargets to describe
    > other systems, we will not be able to change that at a
    > subsequent stage of the IETF standards process because
    > use of it in that fashion will be established practice
    > among multiple implementations.  This may make transitioning
    > away from SendTargets considerably more difficult.
    > 
    > So, let me acknowledge Marj's position that use of SendTargets
    > to describe other systems should be allowed, and solicit
    > other comments on this issue.  In particular, I'd like to
    > hear from those who want to make sure that SendTargets
    > will be able to be retired in the future.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > --David
    > 
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    > +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    > black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    > ---------------------------------------------------
    
    -- 
    Mark A. Bakke
    Cisco Systems
    mbakke@cisco.com
    763.398.1054
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:23 2001
6315 messages in chronological order