RE: iSCSI: Wrapping up SendTargets

["KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>]

Sorry if this is a repost, I sent this message Monday and didn't see it
posted:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1) 
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 5:53 PM
> To: 'Black_David@emc.com'; KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: iSCSI: Wrapping up SendTargets
> 
> 
> > So, let me acknowledge Marj's position that use of SendTargets
> > to describe other systems should be allowed, and solicit
> > other comments on this issue.  In particular, I'd like to
> > hear from those who want to make sure that SendTargets
> > will be able to be retired in the future.
> 
> Well actually, my position is that SendTargets responses 
> should be allowed to include everything that you know about 
> your own implementation, which may include other TCP/IP 
> addresses (aggregation tags included), and other target names 
> that your implementation exports.
> 
> If you allow this behavior, how do you preclude "targets 
> reporting information about other targets"?  How do you 
> distinguish the two cases?
> 
> Marjorie Krueger
> Networked Storage Architecture
> Networked Storage Solutions Org.
> Hewlett-Packard
> tel: +1 916 785 2656
> fax: +1 916 785 0391
> email: marjorie_krueger@hp.com 
>